This is where it starts. One paystub. One address. And one discovery that opened the door to a massive corporate network hiding in plain sight. In October 2024, I worked briefly inside a Costco location, handing out product samples for a company called DRVM LLC. These weren’t food samples
I followed the rules. I respected the process. But JAMS just proved what I feared: the system protects power, not truth. The respondents and I agreed: we’d use an AI-qualified arbitrator. That was the only reason this didn’t go to federal court months ago. That was the deal.
Hollingsworth V. Sanofi-Aventis US et al 3:25-cv-01342-AB The moment we all have been waiting for. On July 31, 2025, I officially filed a Federal Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointment under 9 U.S.C. § 5. After months of obstruction, concealment, and strategic delay by billion-dollar law firms, this case
After months of delay tactics from the respondents. I complied with the process. I gave the system one last chance to act fairly. In return, JAMS issued a strike list so mismatched, it borders on deliberate obstruction. This is not a routine wage dispute or contract claim. This is one
On July 16, Fisher Phillips LLP submitted an Answer on behalf of DRVM LLC in response to my $15 billion arbitration. On the surface, it looks like a typical legal response—blanket denials, generic defenses, and a narrative that tries to oversimplify a complex corporate fraud scheme. But here’s
July 1, 2025. The 48-hour deadline I set for respondents to agree to an AI-qualified arbitrator was in full motion. And then — out of nowhere — a deposit hit my account: $6,130.10 From DRVM LLC Into a bank account I hadn’t used in over six months. No email.
When you’re up against billion-dollar corporations, elite law firms, and a global pharmaceutical giant, the deck is already stacked. But what they never anticipated — was AI. Not their AI. Mine. Using AI as Legal Armor From the start, I’ve been clear: I’m using AI to level the
For months, after naming eight respondents and uncovering a nationwide payroll shell scheme, I was met with complete silence from every party. No responses. No clarification. No accountability. JAMS sent repeated notices to every respondent — physical letters, emails, updates on the arbitration platform. Yet not a single response confirming who
May 14, 2025 — Less than three weeks after I received whistleblower confirmation from the IRS and just two weeks after GRSM’s unexplained withdrawal from the case, Sanofi — one of the largest pharmaceutical corporations on the planet — made a surprise announcement: “Sanofi to invest $20 billion in U.S. jobs
April 28, 2025 — just three days after DRVM’s secret reactivation — two events happened that confirmed everything I suspected… and escalated the case to a national level. 1. IRS Whistleblower Confirmations On this day, I received formal notice from the IRS Whistleblower Office. Not one, not two — three separate claim
April 25, 2025 — the day the case turned from legal dispute to undeniable evidence of concealment. At the heart of this entire arbitration is a dissolved shell company: DRVM LLC. The company that paid wages to workers, issued paystubs, and operated out of a shell address while it was legally
After weeks of silence and evasion following my amended demand, something unprecedented happened. On the same day GRSM informed JAMS they were “evaluating” whether they would continue representing any party beyond DRVM LLC, a second law firm — Fisher Phillips LLP — suddenly entered the picture. They submitted an Official Notice of