There’s been a development regarding the retaliation case. I’ve decided to open a dedicated page on this website that will track everything about the retaliation case, from the original OSHA filing, to the dismissal, to the appeal that now moves this fight before a Department of Labor Administrative
I need to tell you what just happened, because this is the kind of move that usually happens in the dark. The other side, some of the most powerful law firms in the country, tried to reach out directly to the judge’s chambers without me copied. On the surface,
This Isn’t Just Fraud. It’s Intentional. When you’re dealing with a billion-dollar corporate fraud, one of the hardest things to prove is intent. Anyone can say something was a clerical error, a misunderstanding, a paperwork issue. But when every action, across multiple states, multiple entities, and multiple
Federal Judge’s Order On IFP & Service To All RespondentsOrdered on August 18th, 2025Judges decision .pdf181 KBdownload-circle On August 18, 2025, a federal judge granted my request to serve all named respondents in my petition to compel arbitrator appointment. That might sound procedural. But it’s not. This changes
On August 18, 2025, I submitted a Supplemental Notice of Record Clarification in federal court, not to argue the merits of the case, but to correct provable false claims made by Respondent DRVM LLC in their response to my petition. Jorden’s Notice of False ClaimsFiled August 18th, 2025Notice of
On August 14, 2025, DRVM’s law firm, Fisher Phillips LLP, filed a response in federal court before my fee waiver (IFP) was even granted or denied. That’s not normal. The rules are clear: service hasn’t been completed, the court hasn’t ruled on my ability to proceed,
A $15 Billion Case. A Federal Whistleblower. And This Is Their Response. DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator AppointmeFiled August 14th, 2025Respondent DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointme.pdf548 KBdownload-circle On August 14, 2025, the respondents in my federal petition, DRVM
In Evidence #1, I showed you my paystub from DRVM LLC, a dissolved shell company paying me while tied to a web of over 100 corporate entities at a single Las Vegas address. Now, let’s step back and ask: Who’s actually running this? Sanofi at the Top, But
This is where it starts. One paystub. One address. And one discovery that opened the door to a massive corporate network hiding in plain sight. In October 2024, I worked briefly inside a Costco location, handing out product samples for a company called DRVM LLC. These weren’t food samples
I followed the rules. I respected the process. But JAMS just proved what I feared: the system protects power, not truth. The respondents and I agreed: we’d use an AI-qualified arbitrator. That was the only reason this didn’t go to federal court months ago. That was the deal.
Hollingsworth V. Sanofi-Aventis US et al 3:25-cv-01342-AB The moment we all have been waiting for. On July 31, 2025, I officially filed a Federal Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointment under 9 U.S.C. § 5. After months of obstruction, concealment, and strategic delay by billion-dollar law firms, this case
After months of delay tactics from the respondents. I complied with the process. I gave the system one last chance to act fairly. In return, JAMS issued a strike list so mismatched, it borders on deliberate obstruction. This is not a routine wage dispute or contract claim. This is one