Filed in Federal Court: The Petition to Assign an Arbitrator in a $15 Billion Fraud Case

Hollingsworth V. Sanofi-Aventis US et al

3:25-cv-01342-AB

The moment we all have been waiting for. On July 31, 2025, I officially filed a Federal Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointment under 9 U.S.C. § 5. After months of obstruction, concealment, and strategic delay by billion-dollar law firms, this case is now before a United States District Judge — and everything changes from here.

Let’s walk through why this matters and how we got here.

Background: The $15B Case They Tried to Bury in Arbitration

This entire legal battle began in private arbitration. It’s a case involving:

• Dissolved shell companies still operating and issuing W-2s

• A global pharmaceutical giant, Sanofi-Aventis

• False payroll reporting, successor liability, and wage concealment

• Over 100 exhibits proving systematic fraud

• And the first-ever documented use of public AI to build and prosecute the case

The original arbitration demand was filed through JAMS. But from the moment I filed, respondents did everything possible to delay, discredit, and bury this case. They refused to clarify who represented who. They let a dissolved entity take the heat while everyone else hid behind it. Reactivated business licenses in the middle of arbitration. They even tried to derail the entire case by sending a mysterious $6,130 payment to a dormant bank account with no explanation, on the very day there was a deadline preparing to go federal.

Why This Petition Had to Happen

At one point, both sides agreed: This case demands an arbitrator with a background in AI, emerging technology, and fraud. That was the condition for not going to federal court. It was acknowledged on record. Fisher Phillips agreed. I agreed. JAMS knew.

But when JAMS issued the arbitrator list on July 25, it violated that agreement. Not a single arbitrator on the list was qualified in AI systems, whistleblower matters, shell structuring, or fraud oversight.

So I gave JAMS and the respondents 48 hours to fix it. Not 7 days. Not more procedural games. Just fix the list.

JAMS responded by trying to invoke a routine seven-day window, pretending this was a normal case and a qualified list. It’s not. And that list still didn’t meet the agreed-upon standard.

So I did what I promised.

What the Petition Does

The petition formally asks the U.S. District Court of Oregon to assign an arbitrator under Section 5 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows the court to step in when:

• The parties fail to agree on an arbitrator

• The arbitration provider violates the terms of the agreement

• There is clear obstruction or delay of the arbitration process

Every one of those has happened here.

The petition lays out the full record. The reactivation of the dissolved company in the middle of arbitration, the whistleblower confirmations, the illegal payment, the withdrawn counsel, the shell structuring, the agreed-upon AI requirement, and the failure to follow through.

It also publicly exposes that JAMS — the arbitration forum that claims to lead on AI and emerging tech — issued a strike list without a single arbitrator qualified to handle an AI-assisted $15 billion corporate fraud case.

What Happens Next

The case is now assigned to U.S. District Judge Amy Baggio, a former federal public defender and circuit court judge with a deep record on government accountability and procedural fairness. If she grants the petition, it will result in:

• A court-assigned arbitrator qualified to handle complex, AI-assisted cases

• Immediate public exposure of every detail

• Federal enforcement of discovery, process, and whistleblower protections

• National attention on a corporate fraud case larger than Theranos or Enron

The Moment They’ve Tried to Avoid

For months, the respondents — including Sanofi, Chattem, Quten, AMJ Services, DRVM, and their law firms — have worked to stall this moment. They hid behind dissolved companies. They sent secret payments. They let deadlines pass. They buried everything in silence.

But you can’t silence the truth forever. Not when someone is pushing it out.

With this petition, the case breaks wide open. No more backroom arbitration tactics. No more procedural cover. No more hiding behind shell companies.

The public is now watching. No more shouting from the rooftops notifying people of this. You will soon hear it everywhere. From the first moment I started this, I never cared about being believed. I just care about being heard. I built up this case and now it’s time for everyone to see. Now everyone will see the fight that we have been in behind closed doors for the past six months.

This is just the beginning.