The Biggest Fraud Case In History & They Thought No One Would Find It. A global pharmaceutical giant used dissolved shell companies to hide payroll, misclassify workers, and conceal billions.

The Department of Labor Has Opened a Full Federal Retaliation Case, And It Changes Everything.

On November 14, 2025, the United States Department of Labor officially opened my Taxpayer First Act whistleblower retaliation case. This is no longer an OSHA review or a misunderstanding. This is a federal judge inside the Office of Administrative Law Judges taking jurisdiction over a case that involves IRS filings,

Sanofi Just Filed an SEC Report, and Hid a $15 Billion Federal Lawsuit

On October 27, 2025, Sanofi-Aventis S.A. submitted its official Form 6-K to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a 58-page half-year report legally required to list every major event that could affect the company’s financial condition. It was supposed to be transparent. Instead, it’s proof of

The Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply: Why It Matters Now More Than Ever, As Deepak Chopra Attacks A Federal Protected Whistleblower

Filing a Sur-Reply is rare. Normally, a motion, an opposition, and a reply complete the discussion. Courts only allow a Sur-Reply when the opposing side raises new arguments or introduces new evidence that could mislead the record if left unaddressed. That’s exactly what happened here, and that’s why

How Deepak Chopra’s Legal Team Is Trying to Dismiss a Confirmed IRS Whistleblower While Everyone Else Defaults

I filed this case to expose a nationwide payroll fraud hidden behind shell companies, dissolved LLCs, and celebrity‑linked trusts. It’s the kind of case that usually gets buried because it’s too big, too complex, and too uncomfortable. There are nine respondents in this case, from billion‑dollar

This Week in My $15B Case: They Even Went Back on the Judge’s Own Order Case Update

This week, DRVM and its high-priced lawyers at Fisher Phillips pulled a move that tells you everything about how billion-dollar corporations play the system. On the exact day a deadline hit, instead of letting each company respond as the Court ordered, they filed a motion asking the judge to “correct

Opening a Page for the Retaliation Trial

There’s been a development regarding the retaliation case. I’ve decided to open a dedicated page on this website that will track everything about the retaliation case, from the original OSHA filing, to the dismissal, to the appeal that now moves this fight before a Department of Labor Administrative

They Tried to Go Behind My Back to the Judge

I need to tell you what just happened, because this is the kind of move that usually happens in the dark. The other side, some of the most powerful law firms in the country, tried to reach out directly to the judge’s chambers without me copied. On the surface,

Intent Is Already Proven. Reactivations, Deposits, and a Trail of Conscious Moves

This Isn’t Just Fraud. It’s Intentional. When you’re dealing with a billion-dollar corporate fraud, one of the hardest things to prove is intent. Anyone can say something was a clerical error, a misunderstanding, a paperwork issue. But when every action, across multiple states, multiple entities, and multiple

The Judge Just Approved Service on All Respondents & Just Granted The IFP (Fee Waiver) - The Game Just Changed.

Federal Judge’s Order On IFP & Service To All RespondentsOrdered on August 18th, 2025Judges decision .pdf181 KBdownload-circle On August 18, 2025, a federal judge granted my request to serve all named respondents in my petition to compel arbitrator appointment. That might sound procedural. But it’s not. This changes

They Are Making False Statements to the Court, So I Filed a Notice

On August 18, 2025, I submitted a Supplemental Notice of Record Clarification in federal court, not to argue the merits of the case, but to correct provable false claims made by Respondent DRVM LLC in their response to my petition. Jorden’s Notice of False ClaimsFiled August 18th, 2025Notice of

How a Powerful Law Firm Just Tried to Sway a Federal Judge Before the Case Even Started

On August 14, 2025, DRVM’s law firm, Fisher Phillips LLP, filed a response in federal court before my fee waiver (IFP) was even granted or denied. That’s not normal. The rules are clear: service hasn’t been completed, the court hasn’t ruled on my ability to proceed,

They Called It a “Whistleblower Distraction” Here’s How Corporations Try to Bury the Truth (DRVM Official Response)

A $15 Billion Case. A Federal Whistleblower. And This Is Their Response. DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator AppointmeFiled August 14th, 2025Respondent DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointme.pdf548 KBdownload-circle On August 14, 2025, the respondents in my federal petition, DRVM