I need to tell you what just happened, because this is the kind of move that usually happens in the dark. The other side, some of the most powerful law firms in the country, tried to reach out directly to the judge’s chambers without me copied. On the surface,
This Isn’t Just Fraud. It’s Intentional. When you’re dealing with a billion-dollar corporate fraud, one of the hardest things to prove is intent. Anyone can say something was a clerical error, a misunderstanding, a paperwork issue. But when every action, across multiple states, multiple entities, and multiple
Federal Judge’s Order On IFP & Service To All RespondentsOrdered on August 18th, 2025Judges decision .pdf181 KBdownload-circle On August 18, 2025, a federal judge granted my request to serve all named respondents in my petition to compel arbitrator appointment. That might sound procedural. But it’s not. This changes
On August 18, 2025, I submitted a Supplemental Notice of Record Clarification in federal court — not to argue the merits of the case, but to correct provable false claims made by Respondent DRVM LLC in their response to my petition. Jorden’s Notice of False ClaimsFiled August 18th, 2025Notice of
On August 14, 2025, DRVM’s law firm—Fisher Phillips LLP—filed a response in federal court before my fee waiver (IFP) was even granted or denied. That’s not normal. The rules are clear: service hasn’t been completed, the court hasn’t ruled on my ability to proceed,
A $15 Billion Case. A Federal Whistleblower. And This Is Their Response. DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator AppointmeFiled August 14th, 2025Respondent DRVM Response to Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointme.pdf548 KBdownload-circle On August 14, 2025, the respondents in my federal petition — DRVM
In Evidence #1, I showed you my paystub from DRVM LLC, a dissolved shell company paying me while tied to a web of over 100 corporate entities at a single Las Vegas address. Now, let’s step back and ask: Who’s actually running this? Sanofi at the Top, But
This is where it starts. One paystub. One address. And one discovery that opened the door to a massive corporate network hiding in plain sight. In October 2024, I worked briefly inside a Costco location, handing out product samples for a company called DRVM LLC. These weren’t food samples
I followed the rules. I respected the process. But JAMS just proved what I feared: the system protects power, not truth. The respondents and I agreed: we’d use an AI-qualified arbitrator. That was the only reason this didn’t go to federal court months ago. That was the deal.
Hollingsworth V. Sanofi-Aventis US et al 3:25-cv-01342-AB The moment we all have been waiting for. On July 31, 2025, I officially filed a Federal Petition to Compel Arbitrator Appointment under 9 U.S.C. § 5. After months of obstruction, concealment, and strategic delay by billion-dollar law firms, this case
After months of delay tactics from the respondents. I complied with the process. I gave the system one last chance to act fairly. In return, JAMS issued a strike list so mismatched, it borders on deliberate obstruction. This is not a routine wage dispute or contract claim. This is one
On July 16, Fisher Phillips LLP submitted an Answer on behalf of DRVM LLC in response to my $15 billion arbitration. On the surface, it looks like a typical legal response—blanket denials, generic defenses, and a narrative that tries to oversimplify a complex corporate fraud scheme. But here’s
July 1, 2025. The 48-hour deadline I set for respondents to agree to an AI-qualified arbitrator was in full motion. And then — out of nowhere — a deposit hit my account: $6,130.10 From DRVM LLC Into a bank account I hadn’t used in over six months. No email.
When you’re up against billion-dollar corporations, elite law firms, and a global pharmaceutical giant, the deck is already stacked. But what they never anticipated — was AI. Not their AI. Mine. Using AI as Legal Armor From the start, I’ve been clear: I’m using AI to level the
For months, after naming eight respondents and uncovering a nationwide payroll shell scheme, I was met with complete silence from every party. No responses. No clarification. No accountability. JAMS sent repeated notices to every respondent — physical letters, emails, updates on the arbitration platform. Yet not a single response confirming who
May 14, 2025 — Less than three weeks after I received whistleblower confirmation from the IRS and just two weeks after GRSM’s unexplained withdrawal from the case, Sanofi — one of the largest pharmaceutical corporations on the planet — made a surprise announcement: “Sanofi to invest $20 billion in U.S. jobs
April 28, 2025 — just three days after DRVM’s secret reactivation — two events happened that confirmed everything I suspected… and escalated the case to a national level. 1. IRS Whistleblower Confirmations On this day, I received formal notice from the IRS Whistleblower Office. Not one, not two — three separate claim
April 25, 2025 — the day the case turned from legal dispute to undeniable evidence of concealment. At the heart of this entire arbitration is a dissolved shell company: DRVM LLC. The company that paid wages to workers, issued paystubs, and operated out of a shell address while it was legally
After weeks of silence and evasion following my amended demand, something unprecedented happened. On the same day GRSM informed JAMS they were “evaluating” whether they would continue representing any party beyond DRVM LLC, a second law firm — Fisher Phillips LLP — suddenly entered the picture. They submitted an Official Notice of
After filing my Fourth Amended Arbitration Demand, I officially named the entire structure — not just DRVM LLC, but every shell, successor, parent, and beneficiary company involved in the fraudulent system. This included AMJ Services LLC, Sanofi, Chattem Inc, Quten Research Institute, Deepak Chopra, Ashraf Boutros, Marie-Laurie Amiard-Boutros, and more. This
On February 11, 2025, I personally addressed a legal demand letter to Maged “Mike” Boutros — the CEO of a company called DRVM LLC. I sent it to his personal email, his work email, his physical business address, and DRVM’s general inbox. I wanted there to be no mistake: this