The Clarification Loophole - GRSM Retreats After the Amendment - March 20th, 2025
After filing my Fourth Amended Arbitration Demand, I officially named the entire structure — not just DRVM LLC, but every shell, successor, parent, and beneficiary company involved in the fraudulent system. This included AMJ Services LLC, Sanofi, Chattem Inc, Quten Research Institute, Deepak Chopra, Ashraf Boutros, Marie-Laurie Amiard-Boutros, and more.
This amendment pierced the corporate veil and removed the insulation these entities thought they had. That’s when things got messy.
GRSM (Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani) had already entered the case and responded on behalf of DRVM LLC, the dissolved shell company listed on my paystub. But after the amended demand named the deeper structure, GRSM started pulling back — fast.
They didn’t clarify who they were representing anymore. They didn’t respond to service questions. Instead, they stalled and said they were “evaluating” whether they would represent anyone other than DRVM.
But here’s the trap: I had already served DRVM, and that includes its CEO, Maged “Mike” Boutros, and its successor company, AMJ Services.
Legally, when one company dissolves but the business continues under another name, the new company becomes the successor, liable for the debts and lawsuits of the original. This is common corporate law. So DRVM dissolving doesn’t help them — it opens them up to personal liability.
Still, they tried to use this transition to their advantage. The silence from GRSM allowed them to pretend like the original demand — sent directly to Maged — was never properly served. They hoped I wouldn’t re-serve him after the amendment.
I did.
I re-served Maged personally. I re-served AMJ Services, the successor. I followed every rule so they couldn’t slip through a loophole designed to get cases dismissed on “technicalities.” These kinds of games are used all the time — and I refused to play along.
Meanwhile, GRSM ghosted the entire process. For a full month, they didn’t clarify a single thing about who they were representing — even after JAMS requested clarification multiple times. GRSM had been responding to all filings up to that point. They received the amendment, but suddenly went silent.
They knew what was coming. The deeper I dug, the harder it became for them to defend the lie.
This was the beginning of a strategy that’s continued ever since: stall, confuse, and avoid accountability. If they could keep me chasing paperwork and uncertain about who was who, they could buy time. Delay justice. Avoid discovery.
But I was ready.
This post marks the moment the original legal strategy collapsed. Once I exposed the full structure, no one wanted to claim it. That says everything.