The Collision - GRSM vs Fisher Phillips - April 14th, 2025
After weeks of silence and evasion following my amended demand, something unprecedented happened.
On the same day GRSM informed JAMS they were “evaluating” whether they would continue representing any party beyond DRVM LLC, a second law firm — Fisher Phillips LLP — suddenly entered the picture.
They submitted an Official Notice of Appearance claiming to represent… DRVM LLC.
Yes. The same DRVM LLC that GRSM had been representing for over a month.
A company that, let’s be clear, was legally dissolved during the time period in question. In the eyes of the law, it doesn’t even exist. Yet now, two of the most prestigious law firms in the country were claiming to represent the exact same defunct shell.
JAMS immediately asked the obvious question:
“Please clarify whether Fisher Phillips is replacing GRSM or acting as co-counsel.”
And that’s when Fisher Phillips dropped a bombshell:
“We are unaware of GRSM being involved here. I am assuming they are acting on behalf of one of the other named parties.”
A partner at one of the most respected law firms in America said he was unaware that GRSM had already been handling the case. Not only that, he assumed they represented someone else entirely.
Let me repeat that: A multimillion-dollar firm with clients like Fortune 100 companies just said “I assume” in a legal filing.
That’s malpractice. That’s evidence of back-channel coordination by unnamed parties, most likely the true beneficiaries of the shell structure. Sanofi. Chopra. Boutros.
Because if two law firms are representing the same shell without even knowing about each other, it means someone in the background is making decisions without ever formally appearing. They’re hiding behind DRVM. Using it as a smokescreen.
And JAMS noticed. They asked for clarification three separate times:
Who is representing who?
Please confirm party alignment.
Which law firm is attached to which named respondent?
No response. From anyone.
They just let the confusion sit there. Hoping I would drop it. Hoping the process would buckle under its own complexity.
But that’s not what happened.
This moment — this exact collision — exposed everything. It proved that none of the named respondents wanted to step forward. They didn’t want to appear. They didn’t want to acknowledge their role. They wanted to delegate the fallout to a dissolved LLC, while two law firms scrambled to figure out who would take the hit.
It was a legal traffic jam.
But what they didn’t count on… was that I kept the proof.
This post marks a turning point in the case. The moment where silence, confusion, and evasion stopped being strategy — and started becoming evidence.