The Original Demand Letter to DRVM - February 11th, 2025 * 64 Page Amendment - February 26th, 2025
On February 11, 2025, I personally addressed a legal demand letter to Maged “Mike” Boutros — the CEO of a company called DRVM LLC. I sent it to his personal email, his work email, his physical business address, and DRVM’s general inbox. I wanted there to be no mistake: this was official. I had uncovered a fraudulent corporate structure, and this was the first step in holding it accountable.
The demand was clear and based on real documentation. No bluff. No threats. Just truth, backed by legal grounds. But instead of responding to me directly, DRVM lawyered up. Within days, I received an email and physical mail from Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani (GRSM), a billion-dollar law firm, stating that they were now representing DRVM and that all future communication needed to go through them.
That response confirmed two things:
- They knew this was real.
- They were ready to play legal games.
I waited for a response to the demand. Nothing came. No counteroffer. No denial. Not even a courtesy reply. Just silence. So I moved forward and filed the case through JAMS, the arbitration forum that DRVM itself chose in the agreement. That’s when everything really started.
At first, I submitted a basic demand through the JAMS portal. Then I filed a 64-page amendment and attached over 100 exhibits exposing the full fraud. That’s when the system started reacting. That’s when they started retreating. That’s when it became clear: this wasn’t just a wage dispute. This was the beginning of exposing one of the most complex payroll fraud schemes in U.S. history.
I served every named party:
- DRVM LLC (dissolved)
- AMJ Services LLC (the successor)
- Maged “Mike” Boutros
- Quten Research Institute (Qunol)
- Chattem Inc (Allegra, IcyHot)
- Sanofi-Aventis US (parent of Chattem & Qunol)
- Ashraf “Peter” Boutros
- Deepak Chopra
- Marie-Laurie Amiard-Boutros
Every piece of that structure had to be served. If even one dodged, the whole case risked being dismissed on a technicality, a legal loophole that lets billion-dollar companies erase evidence of their fraud.
But I got it done with most. The rest will be in discovery. I closed the loophole. And that original demand to DRVM, sent directly to their CEO, remains the moment this all began.
This wasn’t just a legal filing.
It was the first match struck in a fire they never saw coming.