The Strike List Was Built to Work Against Me, Even After I Cooperated

After months of delay tactics from the respondents. I complied with the process. I gave the system one last chance to act fairly. In return, JAMS issued a strike list so mismatched, it borders on deliberate obstruction.

This is not a routine wage dispute or contract claim. This is one of the largest documented healthcare fraud cases in U.S. history, involving:

Over $15 billion in alleged fraud

W-2 employees paid under dissolved or non-existent companies

A complex shell structure used to evade payroll and taxes

Multiple entities now under federal IRS whistleblower filings

The first known AI-assisted litigation against a global pharmaceutical company

And a multinational player at the center: Sanofi-Aventis U.S.


Despite all this, not one arbitrator on the JAMS strike list has experience with:

• Healthcare fraud or pharmaceutical compliance

• Federal whistleblower law

• AI in legal proceedings

• Modern shell structuring or dissolved-entity concealment


Instead, I was handed a list of retired judges and attorneys who are undeniably qualified in their respective fields — including wage disputes, employment law, family law, personal injury, probate, landlord-tenant issues, and construction defect cases.


But not one has ever ruled on a case involving billion-dollar pharmaceutical fraud.

Not one has overseen an AI-assisted legal strategy.

Not one has dealt with entity-layered concealment of W-2 employees across dissolved corporations.

Here is the wild part — JAMS has experts in AI, forensics, cyber law, and healthcare fraud. They even co-wrote their own AI arbitration rules. They just didn’t include them. And you really think that’s random?

This isn’t neutrality. It’s misalignment by design.

After the IRS confirmed claim numbers. After I exposed the shell layers. After business reactivations and undisclosed $6,000 deposit. After I built the case with precision and made it public for accountability, this is the list they give me? No one even remotely equipped to evaluate the facts?

That’s not coincidence. It’s engineering.

The Facts About the Strike List

JAMS issued its official strike list of proposed arbitrators for my case — a $15 billion corporate fraud claim backed by whistleblower filings and government audits. After reviewing every name:

• None have overseen AI-assisted filings or legal research

• None have ruled on dissolved-entity payroll fraud, shell structuring, or fake W-2 concealment

• None have experience with pharmaceutical compliance, healthcare fraud, or active federal whistleblower cases

Instead, the list includes professionals whose careers have focused on:

• Family law

• Construction defects

• Wage disputes and employment claims

• Real estate, HOA boundary issues, and probate

• Landlord-tenant conflicts and basic contract litigation

Many of these individuals are experienced and accomplished in their domains. But this is not a case about two parties negotiating a lease. This is a global concealment structure uncovered using AI, backed by federal agency confirmation, and tied to one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical conglomerates.


Choosing from this list would mean handing a generational fraud case to a decision-maker who has never handled anything remotely like it.

What Happens Now

I gave JAMS and the respondents a 48-hour deadline to fix the list — to ensure the arbitrator pool includes real experience in:

• AI-assisted legal processes

• Healthcare fraud and pharmaceutical compliance

• Federal enforcement procedures

• Corporate structuring and entity concealment


If they fail to do so, I will immediately submit a federal petition to assign an arbitrator — one with proven qualifications to oversee a case of this scope. That petition will make everything public.

The entire case.

The exhibits.

The audits.

The structure.

The concealment.

No more delay. No more concealment. No more engineered silence.

Let the world see how the system tries to bury fraud not just through obstruction, but through misalignment disguised as neutrality.

Because at this point, it’s not a misunderstanding.

It’s a mechanism.

JAMS responds back and said that you have seven days for the other side to agree on the new list. And if we agree again, they put another list together. I did not agree on a list full of unqualified healthcare, pharmaceutical fraud and AI emerging tech Arbitrators. That is the whole reason why the whole world doesn’t know about this now. And they expect the regular procedure timelines directed to this . They just showed an extreme procedural stacking, and now giving the respondents more time to hide.

No. I’m keeping the 48 hour deadline. They can agree on Either Ryan Abbott or Daniel Garrie, the ones who wrote the JAMS AI Rules. Trust me, the world would love to know the arbitrator strike list that was just given in a $15 billion global pharmaceutical fraud, AI-assisted case.

See the qualifications yourself 

Hon. Faith Ireland (Ret.)

Experienced In: Employment disputes, personal injury, insurance, family law, government land issues

Not Experienced In: Pharma fraud, IRS whistleblower, AI litigation, shell structuring

Hon. Robert B. Freedman

Experienced In: Class actions, consumer fraud, wage/hour law, construction defects, mass torts

Not Experienced In: AI filings, shell structuring, whistleblower law, pharma concealment


Judge Dean S. Lum

Experienced In: Class actions, personal injury, insurance, employment, real estate, franchise disputes

Not Experienced In: Whistleblower law, IRS audits, AI-assisted filings, payroll fraud

Judge Judith H. Ramseyer

Experienced In: Commercial litigation, civil rights, family law, professional liability, estate law

Not Experienced In: Entity fraud, AI litigation, IRS fraud concealment, pharma fraud

Judge J. Kathleen Learned

Experienced In: Construction defects, product liability, estate disputes, environmental claims

Not Experienced In: Dissolved corp concealment, AI litigation, fraud tech, whistleblower law

Hon. Marla O. Anderson

Experienced In: Business breakups, probate, medical malpractice, personal injury, employment law

Not Experienced In: Shell concealment, AI filings, fraud structuring, federal oversight

Judge Chad Allred

Experienced In: Personal injury, construction, estates, public agency claims, federal trials

Not Experienced In: AI litigation, shell fraud, whistleblower claims, pharma structuring

Read more