They Lied to the Court, So I Filed a Notice
On August 18, 2025, I submitted a Supplemental Notice of Record Clarification in federal court — not to argue the merits of the case, but to correct provable false claims made by Respondent DRVM LLC in their response to my petition.
This wasn’t a reply. It was a warning.
Because when a powerful law firm lies on the record — especially about what another judicial forum (JAMS) allegedly did, someone has to correct it before the damage is done.
What They Claimed — And Why It’s False
In their filing (ECF No. 6), DRVM told the federal court that:
“Several parties were removed from the arbitration by JAMS.”
That is completely false. And they know it.
Here’s the truth:
• JAMS never removed any party.
There was no order, ruling, or dismissal.
• What actually happened is that Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP (GRSM) — one of the law firms involved, withdrew their representation of two parties: AMJ Services LLC and Maged Boutros.
• Those entities disappeared from the JAMS dashboard, but not because JAMS dismissed them, because the law firm removed them.
• I re-served them in good faith. I didn’t run. I didn’t avoid. I didn’t hide facts. I re-notified every party. Because the truth holds.
They Said the Parties Are “Unrelated” — But Their Own Documents Say Otherwise
DRVM also told the court that the parties named in my petition are “unrelated.”
But:
• AMJ Services LLC and DRVM LLC were shown to be the same entity in JAMS’ own disclosures.
• Maged Boutros, who they tried to distance themselves from, is in fact the CEO of DRVM LLC — a dissolved entity used as a shield throughout arbitration.
This is the very structure I’ve been trying to expose since the beginning:
Shell companies. Disappearing names. Misleading records. And misleading the court.
Why I Filed the Notice, Before the Court Rules on My IFP
I didn’t want to wait until it was too late.
Their false statements are not small details — they go to the heart of:
• Whether service is valid
• Whether the parties are properly before the court
• Whether the entire petition is rooted in something real
So I filed a short, targeted, factual notice to protect the record.
No arguments. No emotion. Just the truth, backed by exhibits and screenshots.
The Pattern Is Clear Now
Let’s not forget:
• This case was stuck in arbitration for months, hidden from public view.
• I was employed by a dissolved company that no longer legally existed.
• After I submitted whistleblower filings to the IRS, the retaliation began:
shadowbanning, media suppression, obstruction of the arbitration itself.
• Now, in federal court, they’re trying the same playbook — but this time, it’s on the record.
They’re accusing me of “frivolous” conduct for trying to hold onto what we agreed to:
an arbitrator qualified in AI, fraud, and emerging tech because this case involves all three.
They’re trying to discredit me as a person, because they can’t disprove the evidence.
I Filed This to Preserve Fairness, Not to Fight Dirty
The law gives everyone the right to clarify the record.
That’s all I did. And that’s all I’ll continue to do — openly, transparently, and relentlessly.
Because if no one ever pushes back against powerful lies, then they become accepted as truth.
This isn’t just about legal filings anymore.
It’s about whether the court, and the public, will see through a structure built on concealment.
This supplemental notice is now part of the official federal docket.
Anyone can read it. Anyone can follow it. This is a global public interest.
Now the truth is where it belongs: in front of a judge and all of you.