How a Powerful Law Firm Just Tried to Sway a Federal Judge Before the Case Even Started
On August 14, 2025, DRVM’s law firm—Fisher Phillips LLP—filed a response in federal court before my fee waiver (IFP) was even granted or denied. That’s not normal. The rules are clear: service hasn’t been completed, the court hasn’t ruled on my ability to proceed, and the case hasn’t formally begun.
But they didn’t wait.
They jumped in early—not to move the case forward, but to paint me as irrational, vengeful, and somehow unworthy of being heard. In legal terms, that’s called a preemptive narrative injection. In human terms, it’s called manipulation.
What’s wild is that the day before they filed this, I submitted an official whistleblower retaliation complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor/OSHA under the Taxpayer First Act. This came after months of retaliation following my IRS whistleblower filings, which already triggered federal review. I’m now formally protected under federal whistleblower law, with two separate government agencies looking at what I uncovered.
I filed a notice with the court to inform them of this fact. I did so to preserve the integrity of the process and ensure the judge understands what’s really happening here: retaliation, obstruction, and a campaign to discredit me before any discovery, hearing, or witness testimony has even occurred.
What Retaliation Looks Like in 2025
This isn’t about being demoted or fired. I’m not sitting in an office somewhere fighting over a job title.
This is retaliation at scale, designed to:
• Discredit me publicly
• Smear me in front of a federal judge
• Paint my filings as delusional or conspiratorial
• Weaponize “sanctions” language against a whistleblower just for asking the court to honor what was already agreed to
Let’s be clear: I followed every rule.
I submitted every exhibit, every timeline, and every procedural step to JAMS. I asked for a qualified arbitrator under JAMS Rule 15(b). I nominated one with actual AI and whistleblower experience. Who actually wrote the JAMS AI guideline to understand how AI actually found the fraud. I responded every time they went silent. And when the forum stalled for months, I turned to federal court—not out of revenge, but out of necessity.
What They’re Trying to Hide
After I went public in April—right after the IRS confirmed my claim numbers—my TikTok, Reddit, and social media platforms began getting stripped away. Posts were deleted. My reach was throttled. Accounts were banned. These weren’t coincidences.
These were signals.
At the same time, the arbitration process broke down:
• One law firm entered, then mysteriously withdrew
• A second firm (Fisher Phillips) showed up with no clear link to Sanofi or the upstream entities
• DRVM, a dissolved shell company, magically reactivated
• And out of nowhere, they deposited $6,130 into my bank account—without agreement, without communication, and without any legal instruction
It’s obvious what’s going on.
This isn’t about wages anymore. This is about what DRVM was designed to conceal, and the fact that I uncovered it. It’s about how Sanofi, Chattem, and Quten Research Institute used DRVM to hide payroll fraud and tax violations, and how I became the first person to document and report it, with three active IRS whistleblower claims to prove it.
Why I Filed the Notice of Retaliation
Their response in federal court isn’t just legal argument—it’s character assassination. They are portraying me as erratic, manipulative, and dangerous because I refused to back down and let a shell company bury $15 billion in fraud.
So I filed a formal notice to the court. I let the judge know:
• The retaliation is real
• It is ongoing
• It escalated after my IRS filings
• It triggered a second federal agency review with OSHA
• And it is visible in the very response they just filed
If the court is paying attention, they’ll see the timing:
• August 13 – I file a protected retaliation complaint with DOL/OSHA
• August 14 – They file an aggressive federal response, before my fee waiver is even ruled on, with language designed to intimidate and discredit me
This is no longer just about arbitration. This is now a test of federal fairness.
Transparency Is My Protection
They are going to keep bashing me. They are going to try to sway the judge. They are going to try to shape the public’s perception of me before the truth gets out.
So I’m doing the only thing I can do:
Giving the court and the public everything.
Every exhibit. Every email. Every response. Every manipulated tactic.
It’s all documented — and I’ve made it public, permanently, and transparently. I don’t care about being believed. I just need everyone to watch. I want everyone to see for themselves.
Let the public compare my filings to theirs.
Let them see who’s hiding and who’s been transparent the entire time.
We’ll See If the Federal Court Can Restore Fairness
JAMS failed to protect me.
They let dissolved entities litigate in secret.
They ignored agreed qualifications.
They let this forum be used as a tool for obstruction, not justice.
But now the case is in federal court. The question is:
Will this judge see through it?
Or will they be swayed by a well-paid law firm defending a broken structure that’s finally being exposed?
Because right now, the court isn’t being asked to rule on all the facts — it’s being asked to assign a fair and qualified arbitrator, as required under federal law. That’s it.
But even that step matters. Because without it, the case goes right back into a process that’s already been manipulated.
I’ve preserved my right to file a full reply.
This article, like my filing, is a notice:
• A notice that I’ve now filed formal complaints with two federal agencies
• A notice that retaliation is still happening — visible even in how they responded
• And a notice that the entire record is now public and documented for everyone to see
I’m a federal whistleblower.
And I’ve done everything legally, carefully, and publicly.
Now we’ll find out if the court system is ready to do the same.
Let’s see if fairness finally starts here.