How Deepak Chopra’s Legal Team Is Trying to Dismiss a Confirmed IRS Whistleblower While Everyone Else Defaults

I filed this case to expose a nationwide payroll fraud hidden behind shell companies, dissolved LLCs, and celebrity‑linked trusts. It’s the kind of case that usually gets buried because it’s too big, too complex, and too uncomfortable.

There are nine respondents in this case, from billion‑dollar pharmaceutical companies at the top to shell entities at the bottom. Almost all of them have defaulted. They’ve ignored summonses, ducked deadlines, and gone silent.

Except two:

DRVM, a revoked shell LLC at the center of the payroll scheme.

And Dr. Deepak Chopra, the celebrity wellness guru whose name appears on the same trust filings, addresses, and payroll documents I uncovered.

DRVM: A Revoked LLC Acting as a Shield

DRVM keeps filing papers, but not to come clean. They’re using the docket to block defaults, extend deadlines, and deflect attention away from Sanofi, Chattem, and the other respondents at the top of the structure.

They claim to only represent themselves, but their filings work to protect everyone else. This is how shell structures are weaponized: one revoked company clogs the court while the real players stay silent and hope it all disappears.

Chopra: Ignoring Arbitration, Then Scrambling to Avoid Default

For six months in JAMS arbitration, Chopra ignored official notices sent to his own foundation. He didn’t deny being the person named. He didn’t object. He just stayed silent.

Then, once the case moved to federal court and default became a real possibility, Chopra finally appeared, not to clarify, not to help, but to file a Motion to Dismiss claiming I sued the wrong person.

This isn’t some random name on a random document. His name is on Nevada trust and business filings, Florida corporate records, and even tied to a shell company called Rita GP Partners which is his wife’s name. The same evidence the U.S. government already accepted under the IRS Whistleblower Program. I have official claim numbers confirming it.

Yet in his filings, Chopra tries to pretend this has nothing to do with a pharmaceutical company at all. He frames me as if I’m making some wild conspiracy, even though the IRS has already confirmed the structure for federal review.

If he truly wasn’t involved, why not help identify who is? Why fight to erase it instead of clarifying?

What Each Filing Really Says

Here’s what’s actually in front of the court:

1. Chopra’s Motion to Dismiss

• Claims I named the wrong person.

• Suggests his name on public filings doesn’t matter.

• Omits the six months of ignored arbitration notices.

• Frames me as dragging him into a conspiracy with no proof.

2. My Opposition

• Shows the Nevada trusts, Florida records, and shells bearing his name tied to the address on an Oregon Paystub.

• Explains that JAMS already accepted service at his foundation.

• Includes my sworn declaration under penalty of perjury.

• Notes that the IRS already confirmed these same filings under whistleblower review.

3. Chopra’s Reply

• Doesn’t challenge the substance of my evidence.

• Calls my exhibits “unauthenticated” even though I filed a declaration, the exact method required at this stage.

• Pretends this case has nothing to do with a pharmaceutical company, while ignoring that the government itself accepted the filings on Sanofi, Chattem, and Quten Research Institute.

This isn’t a rebuttal. It’s a reframing. It’s twisting my words so it looks like I don’t understand the rules when in fact I’m the only one following them.

The Celebrity And Powerful Playbook

This is what happens when a celebrity or powerful figure is tied to a structure like this:

• They ignore the legal process until default looms.

• They hire a high‑priced firm to file a motion.

• They paint the whistleblower as unstable or conspiratorial.

• They use their brand to make the case look ridiculous.

If you or I tried to do this, if our name was on multiple state filings tied to a multibillion‑dollar fraud, we wouldn’t get to file one motion and walk away. We’d be questioned. We’d be investigated. We’d be expected to explain ourselves.

But when you’re a celebrity wellness guru with global recognition, you can simply say “that’s not me” and ask the court to dismiss the case before discovery ever begins.

That’s what they’re trying to do here.

What’s at Stake if This Works

If the court buys this argument, it creates a blueprint for corporate evasion:

• Register companies under common names.

• Funnel payroll and liability through dissolved entities.

• When caught, claim “you can’t prove it’s me” before discovery.

• Get dismissed.

That’s the end of accountability.

Public business filings would be meaningless.

Whistleblower protections would be meaningless.

Truth wouldn’t matter, only money and name recognition would.

I’m Not Backing Down

I’m a confirmed IRS whistleblower. The U.S. government already accepted my evidence on this structure. I followed the rules. I filed the paperwork. I authenticated my exhibits under oath. I’ve done everything the law requires.

Chopra has built a global reputation on consciousness, goodness, and truth. But here he is, attacking a whistleblower instead of helping to uncover who’s really behind this structure, acting as if my filings are a joke while the government itself confirmed them.

This case is bigger than one person. It’s about whether a celebrity can use their wealth and brand to escape accountability for their name appearing in a massive payroll scheme, while the workers harmed by it are left to fight alone.

I won’t stop exposing it. Because if they win this way, it won’t just be my case that dies. It will be the idea that public records and whistleblower evidence mean anything at all.

The Government Took It Seriously. The Powerful Are Laughing.

Let me say this clearly:

This is the exact same evidence that led one of the most powerful agencies in the world, the IRS, to assign agents, spend federal resources, and open whistleblower claims tied to this fraudulent structure. That’s not speculation. That’s confirmed, with official claim numbers for Sanofi, Chattem, and Quten Research Institute.

But now, in open court, a global celebrity is laughing at that evidence. His lawyers are telling a federal judge that it’s not even worth basic discovery.

This isn’t just a paperwork error.

This is billions of dollars in payroll fraud across the country, with thousands of workers affected and shareholders around the world misled.

And the person we’re told to admire, to follow for wisdom, balance, and moral clarity, is choosing to belittle the whistleblower, dismiss the documentation, and act like nothing matters.

Instead of helping clarify things, which any responsible adult would do if their name was tied to this, he’s trying to get the case thrown out entirely.

No attempt to correct the record.

No good-faith explanation.

No public statement offering assistance.

Just a well-funded legal strategy built around saying, “That’s not me. Move on.”

If the powerful and the rich can do that even when government agencies have already taken action, what hope is left for truth?

This case is a test of whether evidence still matters in this country.

It’s a test of whether the system protects fraud or the people who expose it.

And the answer will come not from what they say but from what the court allows.
And I’ll definitely take it to the highest courts.